All Collections
Talent Acquisition
Bryq Assessment
Navigating Response Style Patterns
Navigating Response Style Patterns

An article describing how to read the results from a social desirability point of view

Manto Papagianni avatar
Written by Manto Papagianni
Updated over a week ago

Self-report assessments are valuable tools for gaining insights into individuals' personalities, attitudes, and behaviors. However, it's essential to recognize that respondents may not always provide completely candid responses. This article explores the concept of response styles in self-report assessments, identifies indicators of response bias, and provides guidelines for interpreting assessment results.

Understanding Response Styles in Self-Report Assessments

Individuals often tailor their responses based on what they perceive as appropriate in a given context, rather than answering with complete honesty. This can lead to response styles that may not accurately reflect their true dispositions. Signs of response style patterns indicative of inaccuracy may include an overuse of extreme or midrange responses. It's crucial to note that such responses do not necessarily indicate deliberate deception but may be influenced by various factors.

To obtain a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of an individual, it's advisable to supplement assessment results with information from additional sources, such as interviews or observations.

Interpreting the Results

Let's delve into some valuable guidelines for extracting meaningful insights from self-report assessment results:

  • Mid-Range Results: When traits cluster within the middle range, it suggests a moderate level of trait expression with potential situational variability. To delve deeper, consider probing with targeted behavioral questions in relevant contexts. This approach unveils valuable nuances in an individual's behavior and trait embodiment.

  • Extreme Results: Extreme scores signal a robust manifestation of the assessed trait in an individual's behavior. This typically signifies a prominent and consistent aspect of their personality or character.

  • "Faking" and Social Desirability: In the realm of self-report assessments, it's vital to recognize the potential influence of "faking" and socially desirable responding. Research underscores the significance of socially desirable responding (SDR), where individuals present themselves more favorably by distorting information. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as "faking."

Notably, SDR is prevalent in contexts like selection processes, where individuals aim to enhance their personality profiles for advantageous outcomes. Consequently, SDR may lead to higher scores on traits like Emotional Stability, Warmth, Social Boldness, Rule-Consciousness, and Perfectionism, while potentially resulting in lower scores on traits like Vigilance, Tension, Apprehension, Self-Reliance, and Abstractedness.

However, it's crucial to exercise caution when interpreting these patterns. They should not be prematurely regarded as conclusive evidence of deception, as various factors can influence response styles in self-report assessments.

How our personalized Interview Guide assists you

To navigate these style patterns effectively, consider supplementing your assessment results with insights from other sources. Our Interview Guide stands as an invaluable resource in this endeavor, providing essential insights that seamlessly complement the assessment process.

With this multi-faceted approach, you'll gain a comprehensive view of individuals, enabling you to make informed decisions that empower both your organization and the individuals you assess. By harnessing the power of self-report assessments and supplementary methods, you'll unravel the complexities of human behavior, paving the way for success.

Did this answer your question?